"One To See Change" Pages

ONE TO SEE CHANGE Pages

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Around our Great Country

Florida:
Please view the following two links to see the amazing job both Gail and Dr Kline did testifying before the Senate on Tuesday (first link) and the House today (second link)
Senate Committee Meeting held at 10:00 AM on 1/14/2014

http://www.myfloridahouse.gov/VideoPlayer.aspx?eventID=2443575804_2014011115&committeeID=2720


Alabama:
The American Civil Liberties Union, the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama, and the law firm Jaffe & Drennan reached a unique settlement Friday in Doe v. Entrekin with the Etowah County Sheriff’s Office, stopping its officers from conducting unannounced, suspicionless, and warrantless searches of a family’s home. The sheriff’s office had been performing such searches at the homes of everyone registered for a sexual offense, without exception, ostensibly to verify their residence. Similar programs exist across Alabama and the nation. Under the terms of the settlement, the sheriff’s office will conduct all in-person residence verifications outside a registrant’s home. Officers may not enter the home without the registrant’s written consent at the time of the verification, unless the officers have a warrant or an emergency makes entry necessary.
http://congress-courts-legislation.blogspot.com/2014/01/aclu-stops-suspicionless-home-searches.html
 

California::
Orange County DA to Appeal Unlawful Ruling of Sex Offender Ban

National:
Abortion Clinic BUFFER Zones -- Sex Offender Residency - Proximity BUFFER Zones

Is there a correlation and should Advocates be watching this case in the U.S. Supreme court?

Argument recap: Buffer zones? Maybe yes, but how big?

Between the complete silence of Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., on the issue on Wednesday and the very active commentary and questioning of Justice Elena Kagan seems to lie the fate of state laws that seek to protect abortion clinics, their patients, and their staffs.

It seemed apparent, in a new “buffer zone” case from Massachusetts, that the Chief Justice holds the key vote on how far such zones are likely to be restricted, but that Kagan may help provide some cover for a decisive ruling that mandated narrower zones. ..Continued.. by Lyle Denniston SCOTUS Blog

No comments:

Post a Comment