Thursday, May 30, 2013

Inquiry recommends 'sexting' offence

Inquiry recommends 'sexting' offence

Massachusetts Sex Offender Resource

Posted: 21 May 2013 02:56 PM PDT
Part of a Windy City Times Special Investigative Series, author Yasmin Nair explores the history of the LGBTQ community and sex offender registries (SOR) and how homosexuality and SOR's have intersected for decades.  Nair also profiles several current LGBTQ individuals and their experiences as registered sex offenders, why The Community should be concerned about SOR's, and why current day activists want to abolish all registries.

Click here to read Bars For Life: LGBTQs and sex offender registries

FBI ran child porn distribution site to lure pedophiles: report

Forwarding from Nevada Cure: Sen. David Vitter’s Amendment 1056 to the 2013 Farm Bill - Call TODAY!

From Nevada CURE:
May 28, 2013

The United States Senate has agreed to Sen. David Vitter’s Amendment 1056 to the 2013 Farm Bill. The amendment would deny food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP or food stamps) for life to anyone convicted of certain federal or state crimes. If the amendment makes it out of the Senate, it may be too late to keep it from becoming law. And like previous successful efforts to impose these kinds of devastating barriers on people with criminal records and their families, we may be fighting to roll this back for decades to come. Your help is needed to make sure the amendment does not make it into the final Farm Bill!

What You Can Do!
Call your Senator’s office TODAY! Time is of the essence because the bill is before the full Senate now and Sen. Stabenow, chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, has said she hopes to finish the bill by the end of this week.

Let them know how harmful this policy would be and that you hope they will ask Senators Reid, Stabenow, and Durbin to amend the final Farm Bill package to remove or limit Amendment 1056.

Message: Amendment 1056 to the Farm Bill is counter-productive and will harm children and families as well as individuals who long ago paid their debt to society. I hope the Senator will encourage Senators Reid, Stabenow, and Durbin to amend the final Farm Bill to:
* Eliminate the food assistance ban in Amendment 1056, or, if that is not possible,
* Narrow the scope of the covered crimes, and
* Limit the duration of the ban to a set and reasonable number of years, and
* Provide a process to receive a waiver from the ban by demonstrating rehabilitation.

Contact Info: for your Senators’ offices can be found by going to the U.S. Senate website,
Why It’s Important Not only would Amendment 1056 create a lifetime ban on food assistance for individuals with certain types of convictions, it would also reduce the amount of assistance received by a family with a member convicted of a covered offense, imposing potential food shortages on children and families everywhere. Because the amendment is retroactive and creates a lifelong ban on food assistance, it has the potential to devastate thousands of individuals and their families, leaving them without food security and prompting individuals leading law-abiding lives to resort back to criminal activity to feed their families.

As you know, individuals with criminal records already confront
thousands of Federal, state, and local legal and policy barriers to employment, education, housing, and public benefits. Because of these and other barriers, unemployment is particularly high among this population, and many individuals struggle to provide for themselves and their families. The Attorney General has asked federal agencies and state attorneys general to reduce or eliminate collateral consequences that do not enhance public safety, such as barriers to public assistance that make it harder for people to meet their most basic needs. Amendment 1056 would add another such counter-productive barrier to the federal code.
— with Nevada Cure.

Monday, May 20, 2013

Press Release from the Florida Action Committee (FAC)

Press Release from the Florida Action Committee (FAC)

FAC Lake Monroe, FL
For Immediate Release
May 20, 2013
Contact: Gail Colletta

Should Kate be Labeled A Sex Offender?

Lake Monroe, FL— May 20, 2013.
High School Sweethearts. The phrase conjures images of endearing romance and innocence, not a predatory act. This week, however, news comes out of Sebastian, Florida, that an 18 year old high school senior is facing charges for having a consensual sexual relationship with a 15 year old high school sophomore. Included in the penalties the 18 year old will face, is being added to the sex offender registry. It is a punishment that will certainly impair her ability to attend college or lead any semblance of a normal life.

Too many cases over the past few years have brought to light stories of teens who are being branded with the “sex offender” label for having what are considered to be “Romeo and Juliet” relationships; consensual romances between two young individuals, where one is just over the age of consent. What has brought significant attention to this case specifically, is that it’s a case of “Juliet and Juliet”. The two parties in this relationship are both female high school students who began a relationship at the beginning of the school year.

So why should this case be distinguished from the thousands of cases just like it where the relationship is heterosexual? Is it because public perception of these types of cases has always been that the perpetrator is some high school football player taking advantage of a vulnerable girl and in this case the “jock” is a female cheerleader? Is it an issue of sexual preference? Is it because Kate doesn’t look like the monster most envision when they hear the word “sex offender”?

As things stand now, if she is convicted; Kate will appear on a public registry with the stigma of being a registered sex offender. The tens of thousands of supporters of the “Free Kate” Facebook page will have gone on with their lives. Few will remember the circumstances of her case. Years from now people will only see that she committed “sexual battery on a child” and her life will be forever ruined.

The case of Kaitlyn “Kate” Hunt presents another face of the registry. Kate’s sexuality should not be at issue here. What should be at issue is the seriously flawed system that paints consensual high school relationships with the same broad brush as child abductors. It’s time to take a look at the individual, the seriousness and circumstances of their offense and their likelihood to reoffend before applying a harsh one-size-fits-all punishment.

A petition was launched on last week which has already collected over 50,000 signatures. We hope the attention brought to this case will shed additional light on the growing national problems with the sex offender registry.

Florida Action Committee (FAC), founded in 2006, is a state-wide consortium of concerned citizens and professionals whose purpose is to promote the prevention of sexual abuse while preserving the safety and dignity of all citizens through carefully structured laws targeting the truly violent, forced, and/or dangerous predatory acts of sex. FAC believes that many aspects of the current approach to sex offenders seriously undermine justice and actually increase the threat of sexual assault against others, particularly children. FAC opposes a publicized registry of sex offenders and seeks to bring an end to the humiliation of people who have already paid for their crimes. FAC asserts that only by supporting justice for all people—offenders and victims alike can a truly safe society be built and secured for all Americans.

Saturday, May 11, 2013

With Justice for All: Examining Chelsea's Law--Part I and II

With Justice for All: Examining Chelsea's Law--Part I: Several months ago, two organizations, Chelsea’s Light Foundation and Chelsea’s Shield, received a flurry of publicity and promotion. Both ...

With Justice for All: Examining Chelsea's Law, Part II -- Who Will Chels...: Chelsea’s Law, signed into California law on September 9, 2010, by then-governor Schwarzenegger scant months after the court sentenced John ...

Thursday, May 2, 2013

Massachusetts Sex Offender Resource Blog: Incarceration, Probation, and Life After as an RSO: Some Thoughts On The Human Rights Watch Report: "R...

Massachusetts Sex Offender Resource Blog: Incarceration, Probation, and Life After as an RSO: Some Thoughts On The Human Rights Watch Report: "R...: Read the HRW Press Release Read the HRW Report I usually try to avoid unnecessary opinion on this blog since information is more importan...

YOUR SAY Part 4 - Registered Former Sex Offenders and their Families Speak Out!

County Executive Meets With Common Council, County Legislature To Discuss Sex Offenders

FAC: Online Case Consideration Form

Dear FAC Family,
A month ago, we reached out to invite registrants in Florida to submit Case Consideration Questionnaires in support of our effort to challenge some of the harsh restrictions imposed on registrants in this state.

For the convenience of registrants and their families, FAC has prepared an online Case Consideration form, which can be found here:
Please note that submissions will remain confidential and no personal information will be used unless you expressly authorize disclosure of information.

Our initial challenge will be the residency restrictions. As such, we are only considering submissions from individuals or their family members who are or have been in the community as a registrant, whether on probation/supervised release or who have completed their sentence.

We strongly suggest you participate and encourage others to as well. As our motto suggests; “With Unity Comes Change” so we must unify in our effort to effectuate changes.

FAC Legal Committee

One To See Change Past Posts

One to See Change Blog List

"When an American says that he loves his country, he means not only that he loves the New England hills, the prairies glistening in the sun, the wide and rising plains, the great mountains, and the sea. He means that he loves an inner air, an inner light in which freedom lives and in which a man can draw the breath of self-respect."
~Adlia Stevenson U.S. Vice President (1893–1897) and Congressman (1879–1881)

On a Personal Note

Thanks for the opportunity to express my thoughts regarding the issue of citizens’ rights, particularly addressing certain sex offenders’ crimes that do not fit the devastating, inequitable and endless punishment given.

As you know, many young men and women lives across the nation are being destroyed by incarceration, life-time registry and restrictive laws that do more harm than good. For those individuals, there is no second chance.

Below is a personal letter to President Obama:
* * * *
“Dear President Obama,

I truly agree with your sentiments that individuals, such as ex-felons, should be able to receive a second chance at life. Since we all know that one can veer off that path of life and travel along rough, rocky terrain, sometimes running off and ending up in some ditch. We all have made our fill of mistakes and sometimes those held a costly consequence that changed life forever. So we lived through it, trying harder to make things right with family, friends and those around us, but what about those who aren’t able to make things right even if they tried…because they’re labeled as too dirty, a leper, a person who is rejected from society and home.

But what if they’re a seventeen year old and had sex with a fifteen year old, consensual at that? Or they’re a teen that had gotten so enraged after a breakup that he sent out naked pictures of his girlfriend on his cell phone or email? Or an individual urinates where someone just happens to see them?

All are wrong and a travesty but do they deserve the life of no second chance with a registry that ends all. They are labeled, no jobs, no where to live…they have been deemed a menace to society, a plague. These certain circumstances, and many other situations similar to these, I believe still deserve a second change.

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

After my son’s early release and two years of prison, I thought I had handled that fact graciously knowing after serving his time he would be able to get that fresh start, that second chance. He was an exemplary inmate, GED, college courses and vocational classes. Little did I know that a second chance on the outside was the farthest from the truth? He now struggles and lives in a trailer park sharing a trailer with another and surrounded by others in the same rocking boat, one to float endlessly in shark infested waters. I see him little because of probation requirements (he couldn’t live with us because we were 800 feet near a school). My family is afraid of what would happen to them if he lived with them…vigilantism. My son has no other place to stay since others condemn him of his crime that is screamed from the highest rooftop. Sex offender, sex offender!

Not all sex offenders are pedophiles or predators but some are simply young kids that make one stupid and rash decision that eventually changes everything, and they have no idea what they’ve done until their life is never their own. Exactly, where is that second chance for those sex-offenders who are lumped together with pedophiles and predators? Now, it makes me sick to think of my son’s future and many like him that are on the registry and many with no second chance…ever. I am asking you as a mother and as another concerned citizen of the United States that these laws are looked at again and taken into serious consideration in what they are doing to the Constitution of the United States, not for sex offenders in general but the future rights of every citizen, before anymore are put into effect. They unjustly strip an offender of their rights and place them in a guillotine that can be easily set off by anyone and at anytime. Where is the second chance for ex-sex offenders in the present, pending and future laws?”
* * * *
What truly saddens me is the weakness and deterioration of what the sex offense issue is doing to our once, great nation. Across Europe, others are seeing the injustice and disregard of rights, but we ignore this problem and it makes me wonder where humanity is heading….

We have become a hysterical society in which our latest witch-hunt is a sex offender--no matter his/her crime.

Below is a email sent from a foreign advocate to a father of a sex offender:
* * * *
“The tragic story of your son's death is just so sad that it's difficult to explain how. It was very hard to read your letters. It seems almost unbelievable that this can take place in a democracy! From our point of view, there is no justice in this. Not in any way: not for you, your son, the former girl friend – or even the state.

It is an abusive legal system. It seems barbaric. And we are so very sorry that this takes place. That's why it's so important for us to try to neutralize the debate with this…, hopefully making some changes. ….. to show the every day life of the sex offenders, trying to show how they keep on being punished, even after served prison time…..But we will for sure tell the story of the injustice that your son has been exposed to.”
* * * *
I appreciate everyone's commitment and backing to protect everyone's civil rights, plainly as noted in the Constitution of the United States and is presupposed, giving ALL men are “life, liberty and pursuit of happiness.”