Treatment for a sexual predator costs a whopping $175,000 per person per year in New York: study
The programs, formed back when states were more flush with cash than they are in the current recession, were meant to keep dangerous sex offenders considered capable of striking again locked up once they’d served their time. But the civil commitment programs are setting the states back by hundreds of millions of dollars annually and creating a problem for legislators. They must trim budgets but don’t want to be perceived by their constituents as soft on child molesters and other sex predators, reports the AP.
“I’ve heard people in a lot of the states quietly say, ‘Oh, my God, I wish we’d never gotten this law,” University of Maryland School of Law Prof. Lawrence Fitch told the AP. “No one would ever dare offer repeal because it’s just untenable.”
At a Moose Lake, Minn., facility, 400 sex offenders divide their time between group-therapy sessions and activities like painting state-park signs. Minnesota plans an expansion at Moose Lake, which resembles a medium-security prison.
What makes facilities like this one so expensive is the cost of all the treatment staff – behavioral therapists, social workers, psychiatrists and psychologists. For example, there is a treatment team consisting of five or six people for every 25 to 50 offenders at the Moose Lake facility.
Overall, the cost of keeping sex offenders in treatment costs more than five times what it does to keep offenders incarcerated, reports the AP, and this doesn’t include all the legal expenses incurred when committing someone.
Some wonder if the programs are even effective. Research shows treatment can only lower a sexual predator’s chances of committing another sex crime slightly – by a little less than 20%, Fitch told the AP.
As lawmakers with less money in hand continue to make cuts to education and health care, some wonder how viable the civil commitment programs are.
“It’s easy to say, ‘Lock everybody up and throw away the key,’ ” state Rep. Michael Paymar (D-St. Paul) told the AP. But, added Paymar, who heads a public-safety budget panel, “It’s just not practical.”
No comments:
Post a Comment